<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Organizations aim to represent podcasters?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notesfromtheridge.edublogs.org/2007/08/08/organizations-aim-to-represent-podcasters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notesfromtheridge.edublogs.org/2007/08/08/organizations-aim-to-represent-podcasters/</link>
	<description>One teacher's adventures with Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:03:12 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Sandridge</title>
		<link>http://notesfromtheridge.edublogs.org/2007/08/08/organizations-aim-to-represent-podcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Sandridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notesfromtheridge.edublogs.org/2007/08/08/organizations-aim-to-represent-podcasters/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the note, Durff,

That&#039;s sort of where I&#039;m at with this.  I can see where corporate radio station owners (Clear Channel) and those outside of education - who normally operate for profit would be interested in making sure that their interests are protected.  And to some degree, I can see where perhaps educational consultants or gurus may seek financial compensation for their work.  Though, in the spirit of keeping knowledge freely available to all who seek it (students) or seek to deliver it (educators), I would hope that those in our little Web 2.0 circle would opt to keep their information freely available under say, Creative Commons licensing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the note, Durff,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s sort of where I&#8217;m at with this.  I can see where corporate radio station owners (Clear Channel) and those outside of education &#8211; who normally operate for profit would be interested in making sure that their interests are protected.  And to some degree, I can see where perhaps educational consultants or gurus may seek financial compensation for their work.  Though, in the spirit of keeping knowledge freely available to all who seek it (students) or seek to deliver it (educators), I would hope that those in our little Web 2.0 circle would opt to keep their information freely available under say, Creative Commons licensing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrsdurff</title>
		<link>http://notesfromtheridge.edublogs.org/2007/08/08/organizations-aim-to-represent-podcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>mrsdurff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notesfromtheridge.edublogs.org/2007/08/08/organizations-aim-to-represent-podcasters/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Who would pay that amount of money? I guess those who want to protect their rights.
Recording a podcast with kids is easy!
I never seek to protect my own interests - that&#039;s a waste of time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who would pay that amount of money? I guess those who want to protect their rights.<br />
Recording a podcast with kids is easy!<br />
I never seek to protect my own interests &#8211; that&#8217;s a waste of time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
